Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,232
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Minnesota totaled $14,188,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hagert Farms Inc | Redwood Falls, MN 56283 | $31,602 |
22 | Frans Rosenquist Farms Inc | Atwater, MN 56209 | $31,314 |
23 | Debra Stanley | Grygla, MN 56727 | $30,455 |
24 | Bottem Farms Inc | Saint James, MN 56081 | $30,030 |
25 | Trevor Michael Telkamp | Hoffman, MN 56339 | $29,946 |
26 | Acorn Ridge Inc | Swanville, MN 56382 | $29,191 |
27 | Lake Swan Cattle Company LLC | Gibbon, MN 55335 | $28,974 |
28 | Wheeling Grain Partnership | Northfield, MN 55057 | $28,805 |
29 | Rhoda A Habedank | Twin Valley, MN 56584 | $28,611 |
30 | River Bend Ag Partnership | Tintah, MN 56583 | $28,167 |
31 | Lacey L Miller | Storden, MN 56174 | $28,045 |
32 | Susan M Schema | Faribault, MN 55021 | $27,718 |
33 | Jon Martin Krause | Staples, MN 56479 | $27,665 |
34 | R & R Farms Of Hoffman | Hoffman, MN 56339 | $27,005 |
35 | Erick Trontvet | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $26,877 |
36 | Graff Feedlots LLC | Sanborn, MN 56083 | $26,555 |
37 | Polo Farm Inc | Redwood Falls, MN 56283 | $26,507 |
38 | Knoll Brothers | Warren, MN 56762 | $26,375 |
39 | Pinedale Farms | Waseca, MN 56093 | $26,137 |
40 | Ryberg Farms Inc | Buffalo Lake, MN 55314 | $25,999 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”