Farm Subsidy information
Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 46,632
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Minnesota totaled $1,332,000,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jeff Stamer Farms Partnership | Hector, MN 55342 | $558,110 |
22 | Briks Farms Partnership | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $554,230 |
23 | Field Brothers Farms Gp | Stephen, MN 56757 | $546,954 |
24 | Reece Farms Inc. | Farwell, MN 56327 | $537,495 |
25 | Reece Industries Inc. | Lowry, MN 56349 | $537,494 |
26 | Tollefson Farms | Beltrami, MN 56517 | $531,984 |
27 | Skaurud Grain Farms | Gary, MN 56545 | $519,932 |
28 | Holden Farms Inc | Northfield, MN 55057 | $519,484 |
29 | Juhl Farms Jv | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $509,965 |
30 | Prosser Kuznia Gp | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $491,237 |
31 | Stoltman Farms | Argyle, MN 56713 | $484,774 |
32 | Damon & Ashley Stroble Partnership | Angus, MN 56762 | $471,714 |
33 | David Swenson & Craig Swenson Ptr | Shelly, MN 56581 | $471,563 |
34 | D & K Farms Inc | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $457,300 |
35 | Alex Bishop | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $455,279 |
36 | Joe Bienek | Warren, MN 56762 | $454,830 |
37 | Machelle J Engelstad | Fertile, MN 56540 | $449,146 |
38 | Cmgb Farms | Gary, MN 56545 | $446,838 |
39 | Kevin And Kurt Leiser Kl Farms | Fertile, MN 56540 | $441,977 |
40 | Anderson Farms | Karlstad, MN 56732 | $434,178 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”