Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 315
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Minnesota totaled $210,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Scott D Anderson | Litchfield, MN 55355 | $1,184 |
42 | James R Jirik | Kilkenny, MN 56052 | $1,163 |
43 | Dennis Lutteke | Wells, MN 56097 | $1,150 |
44 | Nolan A Lenzen | Eagle Bend, MN 56446 | $1,128 |
45 | Christopher A Koller | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $1,101 |
46 | Zachary S O'reilly | Goodhue, MN 55027 | $1,100 |
47 | Featherstone Fruits And Vegetables LLC | Rushford, MN 55971 | $1,100 |
48 | Robert Oswald Thell | Freeport, MN 56331 | $1,094 |
49 | Benedict Cook | Adrian, MN 56110 | $1,085 |
50 | Jay Peterson | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $1,084 |
51 | Steve Niedzwiecki | Long Prairie, MN 56347 | $1,080 |
52 | Leo J Seykora | Owatonna, MN 55060 | $1,070 |
53 | Luann Balfany | Sacred Heart, MN 56285 | $1,062 |
54 | Dean Richards | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $1,056 |
55 | Jacob Matthew Yost | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $1,050 |
56 | Lonny R Dietz | Altura, MN 55910 | $1,046 |
57 | Jared M Lindaman | Westbrook, MN 56183 | $1,041 |
58 | , | $1,021 | |
59 | Robert Horstmann | Wadena, MN 56482 | $1,016 |
60 | Walch Family Dairy | Rollingstone, MN 55969 | $1,009 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”