Farm Subsidy information
Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 44,164
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Minnesota totaled $961,961,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | H & H Ag LLC | Fulda, MN 56131 | $243,741 |
42 | New Heights Dairy LLC | Rice, MN 56367 | $242,512 |
43 | Partners Of Peatland Gp | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $242,390 |
44 | 6th Gen Organics Partnership | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $238,992 |
45 | David R Popowski | Ivanhoe, MN 56142 | $235,094 |
46 | Donald Thomas Hoffman | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $231,476 |
47 | Wilwerding Dairy Inc | Freeport, MN 56331 | $231,469 |
48 | Mitchell Lee Findlay | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $230,441 |
49 | A & R Rivard Prtshp | Argyle, MN 56713 | $228,413 |
50 | Keith Budke | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $225,309 |
51 | O'loughlin Farms LLC | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $216,945 |
52 | Valiant LLC | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $211,497 |
53 | Rice Farms Inc | Roseau, MN 56751 | $211,291 |
54 | Carlson Dairy Llp | Pennock, MN 56279 | $209,317 |
55 | Jason W Beyer | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $203,059 |
56 | Jamie Vanessa Beyer | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $201,930 |
57 | Blue Mound Dairy Farm Inc | Luverne, MN 56156 | $199,448 |
58 | Molitor Organic Farms Inc | Saint Cloud, MN 56301 | $197,873 |
59 | Todd Ibberson | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $197,587 |
60 | Joshua R Osland | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $196,564 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”