Emergency Conservation Program in Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,015
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Minnesota totaled $6,743,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Tim Volkmann | Deer Creek, MN 56527 | $15,016 |
82 | Paul Rettmann | Buffalo Lake, MN 55314 | $15,000 |
83 | Cenco Farms Inc | Hastings, MN 55033 | $14,848 |
84 | Staub Family Farms | West Concord, MN 55985 | $14,775 |
85 | W Dale Omodt | Houston, MN 55943 | $14,718 |
86 | Ronald A Anderson | Hanley Falls, MN 56245 | $14,692 |
87 | Donald J Doerr | Winona, MN 55987 | $14,541 |
88 | Gerald Lien | Flom, MN 56541 | $14,529 |
89 | Roger Anderson | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $14,400 |
90 | Brian Lee Jadeke | Warren, MN 56762 | $14,282 |
91 | Black Bell Farms | Twin Valley, MN 56584 | $14,048 |
92 | Russell Pearson | Madison, MN 56256 | $13,772 |
93 | Father Tim Noah | Fargo, ND 58103 | $13,760 |
94 | William R Nytes | New Prague, MN 56071 | $13,500 |
95 | Maring Bros | Kenyon, MN 55946 | $13,428 |
96 | David Norton | Kellogg, MN 55945 | $13,418 |
97 | Charles O Martinson | Franklin, TN 37064 | $13,146 |
98 | Kenneth J Witt | Houston, MN 55943 | $13,135 |
99 | Tim Bichel | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $13,025 |
100 | Kallock Farms Prtshp | Oslo, MN 56744 | $12,977 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”