Total Conservation Programs in Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 30,398
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Minnesota totaled $138,691,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Eric And Gail Petersen Family Farm Lp | Ruthton, MN 56170 | $42,026 |
182 | Mary Ann Hendricks Revocable Trust | Minneapolis, MN 55408 | $42,000 |
183 | Scott A Philipp | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $41,733 |
184 | Kimberly Philipp | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $41,732 |
185 | Mr Randy Joel Buboltz | Hector, MN 55342 | $41,668 |
186 | Catherine Van Leeuwe Rev Trust | Ghent, MN 56239 | $41,651 |
187 | Randy M Van Leeuwe | Ghent, MN 56239 | $41,651 |
188 | James K Sathre | Adams, MN 55909 | $41,644 |
189 | Helen A Anderson | Willmar, MN 56201 | $41,638 |
190 | David O Bushard | Marshall, MN 56258 | $41,380 |
191 | Mark Braton | Pelican Rapids, MN 56572 | $41,370 |
192 | Roger M Peterson | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $41,350 |
193 | Beverly Ann Peterson Estate | Canby, MN 56220 | $41,326 |
194 | Charles Pearson | Eyota, MN 55934 | $41,317 |
195 | Rita Debrobander | Minneapolis, MN 55416 | $41,295 |
196 | M S W Svor Farm | Benson, MN 56215 | $41,293 |
197 | Ronald J Gehling | Preston, MN 55965 | $41,260 |
198 | Paul Rognes | Glenville, MN 56036 | $41,170 |
199 | Ronald C Weber | Winthrop, MN 55396 | $41,144 |
200 | Susan M Pearce Rewoldt | Cedar Falls, IA 50613 | $41,142 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”