Farm Subsidy information
Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 63,033
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Minnesota totaled $1,487,000,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Michael Stamer Farms General Partnership | Willmar, MN 56201 | $384,361 |
42 | Ultima Bank ** | Bemidji, MN 56601 | $378,707 |
43 | Grey Eagle Pork LLC | Villard, MN 56385 | $377,947 |
44 | Waage Farms | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $374,775 |
45 | Thorson Farming Joint Venture | East Grand Forks, MN 56721 | $371,373 |
46 | Fiedler Finishing, LLC | Villard, MN 56385 | $369,302 |
47 | Sparboe Farms Inc | Litchfield, MN 55355 | $367,900 |
48 | Magnusson Farms | Roseau, MN 56751 | $361,788 |
49 | Brinkmeyer Farms | Holland, MN 56139 | $361,698 |
50 | Scotch Prairie Farms LLC | Lake City, MN 55041 | $359,866 |
51 | Jirik Sod Farms Inc | Farmington, MN 55024 | $359,303 |
52 | Deal Bros Farming Partnership | Doran, MN 56522 | $356,903 |
53 | Fluit Farms Inc | Luverne, MN 56156 | $356,739 |
54 | Goodrich Farms | Easton, MN 56025 | $355,713 |
55 | Mattson Farms Partnership | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $354,158 |
56 | Wald Farms | East Grand Forks, MN 56721 | $353,691 |
57 | River Valley Pork Llp | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $352,452 |
58 | Stoltman Farms | Argyle, MN 56713 | $352,078 |
59 | Downs Family Farms Lllp | Mankato, MN 56001 | $344,866 |
60 | Four K Farms Ptshp | Morris, MN 56267 | $344,291 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”