Farm Subsidy information
Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 188,826
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Minnesota totaled $30,403,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Fultz Farms Inc | Tracy, MN 56175 | $3,378,275 |
62 | Hector Farms III Family Partnership | Hector, MN 55342 | $3,340,585 |
63 | Ronnevik Farms | Fergus Falls, MN 56537 | $3,322,890 |
64 | L & B Theis Farms | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $3,319,642 |
65 | Armstrong Family Farms | Owatonna, MN 55060 | $3,311,987 |
66 | Enstad Bros | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $3,311,554 |
67 | Millner Farms | Roseau, MN 56751 | $3,293,187 |
68 | S & H Farms Partnership | Mankato, MN 56001 | $3,288,499 |
69 | Peterson Partners | Sacred Heart, MN 56285 | $3,285,549 |
70 | Oehlke Farms | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $3,281,939 |
71 | Circle M | Warren, MN 56762 | $3,271,563 |
72 | Finseth Family Farms | Fountain, MN 55935 | $3,259,454 |
73 | Dairyridge Inc | Long Prairie, MN 56347 | $3,254,795 |
74 | Virgil Gryskiewicz & Patricia Gryskiewicz Farms | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $3,248,377 |
75 | Ihnen Family Farms | Round Lake, MN 56167 | $3,240,220 |
76 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $3,227,671 |
77 | Woinarowicz Bros Jv | Stephen, MN 56757 | $3,214,253 |
78 | Two Dogs Farm | Benson, MN 56215 | $3,213,241 |
79 | Grandview Farms Inc | Ghent, MN 56239 | $3,209,000 |
80 | Da Vroman Inc | Milroy, MN 56263 | $3,196,933 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”