Conservation Reserve Program in Minnesota, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 92,672

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Minnesota totaled $3,316,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
1Bjornstad-east Farm JvWalhalla, ND 58282$3,475,740
2Williams Farms PartnershipArthur, ND 58006$1,476,928
3Shop Farms General PartnershipDetroit Lakes, MN 56501$1,473,799
4Gmg FarmsEuclid, MN 56722$1,364,815
5Dr Roland LarterHallock, MN 56728$1,355,592
6Evert LangelettThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,324,135
7Timothy PrestebakGoodridge, MN 56725$1,286,511
8Virgil Gryskiewicz & Patricia Gryskiewicz FarmsGreenbush, MN 56726$1,282,511
9Carroll Ray GriffithDetroit Lakes, MN 56501$1,243,138
10Robert E HalvorsonGoodridge, MN 56725$1,238,986
11Betty LangelettThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,238,961
12Agcountry Farm Credit Services **Jamestown, ND 58402$1,233,330
13Norman J LindemoenNewfolden, MN 56738$1,186,680
14George W OwensAngus, MN 56762$1,155,554
15Kruger Bros Farms IncWarren, MN 56762$1,151,428
16Richard A OlsonThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,145,687
17M & S Farms IncGreenbush, MN 56726$1,135,982
18Schuler Grygla PtnspWahpeton, ND 58075$1,089,688
19Lawrence LindEstherville, IA 51334$1,082,728
20Randy LindemoenNewfolden, MN 56738$1,065,479

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag