Direct Payment Program in Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 74,477
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Minnesota totaled $3,280,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | Bradow Farms | Fergus Falls, MN 56537 | $744,099 |
| 62 | B K Partnership | Pembina, ND 58271 | $737,338 |
| 63 | Circle M | Warren, MN 56762 | $735,401 |
| 64 | Magnusson Farms | Roseau, MN 56751 | $735,262 |
| 65 | Gilbertson Brothers | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $728,802 |
| 66 | Kramer Farms | Hector, MN 55342 | $724,915 |
| 67 | Carlson Brothers Of Darwin, Lllp | Darwin, MN 55324 | $715,373 |
| 68 | Peterson Partners | Sacred Heart, MN 56285 | $706,808 |
| 69 | Brad & Dean Hoffmann Ptshp | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $704,862 |
| 70 | Wald Farms | East Grand Forks, MN 56721 | $702,701 |
| 71 | Erickson Farms | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $685,671 |
| 72 | Deere Farms | Hallock, MN 56728 | $684,049 |
| 73 | Dahl Brothers | Glyndon, MN 56547 | $682,330 |
| 74 | Paulson Farms | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $681,546 |
| 75 | Eec Farm Partnership | Ulen, MN 56585 | $677,221 |
| 76 | Woinarowicz Bros Jv | Stephen, MN 56757 | $673,315 |
| 77 | Arlyn & Marilyn Stroble Prtshp | Angus, MN 56762 | $670,592 |
| 78 | Dressel Bros | Medford, MN 55049 | $666,297 |
| 79 | Brinkmeyer Farms | Holland, MN 56139 | $654,602 |
| 80 | Estrem Farms | Nerstrand, MN 55053 | $652,698 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf