Total Conservation Programs in Minnesota, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 98,359

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Minnesota totaled $3,365,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
1Bjornstad-east Farm JvWalhalla, ND 58282$3,475,740
2The Nature ConservancyMinneapolis, MN 55415$2,200,637
3Williams Farms PartnershipArthur, ND 58006$1,476,928
4Shop Farms General PartnershipDetroit Lakes, MN 56501$1,473,799
5Gmg FarmsEuclid, MN 56722$1,368,992
6Dr Roland LarterHallock, MN 56728$1,355,592
7Evert LangelettThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,324,135
8Timothy PrestebakGoodridge, MN 56725$1,286,511
9Virgil Gryskiewicz & Patricia Gryskiewicz FarmsGreenbush, MN 56726$1,282,511
10Carroll Ray GriffithDetroit Lakes, MN 56501$1,243,138
11Robert E HalvorsonGoodridge, MN 56725$1,239,886
12Betty LangelettThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,238,961
13Agcountry Farm Credit Services **Jamestown, ND 58402$1,233,330
14Norman J LindemoenNewfolden, MN 56738$1,186,680
15George W OwensAngus, MN 56762$1,155,554
16Kruger Bros Farms IncWarren, MN 56762$1,151,428
17Richard A OlsonThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,145,687
18M & S Farms IncGreenbush, MN 56726$1,135,982
19Four K Farms PtshpHancock, MN 56244$1,098,971
20Schuler Grygla PtnspWahpeton, ND 58075$1,089,688

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag