Production Flexibility Program in Becker County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 754
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Becker County, Minnesota totaled $16,180,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mattson Farms Partnership | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $827,206 |
2 | Okeson Farms Partnership | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $423,658 |
3 | Jetvig Farms Inc | Fargo, ND 58103 | $309,687 |
4 | Gerald Trom | Ulen, MN 56585 | $246,720 |
5 | Chad Jetvig Farms Inc | Fargo, ND 58103 | $226,875 |
6 | Kevin Lunde | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $210,819 |
7 | Kevan Nelson | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $204,081 |
8 | D G Larson Co | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $203,107 |
9 | Jerome A Matter | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $199,903 |
10 | Jerry Matter Jr | Rochert, MN 56578 | $199,113 |
11 | Dwight Fevig | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $196,672 |
12 | Anthony Zurn | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $196,066 |
13 | William Steffl | Callaway, MN 56521 | $194,388 |
14 | Circle E Farms Inc | Ulen, MN 56585 | $187,929 |
15 | Curt W Nelson | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $186,722 |
16 | Mattson Brothers Inc | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $185,643 |
17 | Mike Dauner | Hawley, MN 56549 | $172,507 |
18 | Tom Herfindahl | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $168,309 |
19 | Mattson Farms Inc | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $163,726 |
20 | David G Molacek | Callaway, MN 56521 | $155,664 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>