Conservation Reserve Program in Becker County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,669
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Becker County, Minnesota totaled $48,520,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bruce Paakh | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $167,584 |
42 | George Lund | Audubon, MN 56511 | $165,827 |
43 | Milo Letourneau | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $163,676 |
44 | Danny Feldt | Frazee, MN 56544 | $163,551 |
45 | Richard Lorentzen | Edina, MN 55436 | $161,321 |
46 | Lloyd Tretbar | Osage, MN 56570 | $160,715 |
47 | J William Robinson | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $159,740 |
48 | White Earth Reservation Tribal Council | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $156,154 |
49 | Double K Ranch | Fergus Falls, MN 56537 | $154,313 |
50 | Duane M Hanson | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $154,139 |
51 | Leroy Feldt | Frazee, MN 56544 | $150,234 |
52 | Richard White | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $146,459 |
53 | Bobby Rethwisch | Frazee, MN 56544 | $145,635 |
54 | Marie Kladzyk | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $144,938 |
55 | James Lakoduk | Fargo, ND 58102 | $142,623 |
56 | Shane K Kjellberg | Ypsilanti, ND 58497 | $140,757 |
57 | James J Mack | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $140,115 |
58 | Paul W Miller | Harris, MN 55032 | $137,354 |
59 | Marvin Vareberg | Detroit Lakes, MN 56502 | $137,071 |
60 | Douglas Swenson | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $135,505 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”