Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Becker County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 177
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Becker County, Minnesota totaled $1,470,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Anthony Mertens Jr | Ogema, MN 56569 | $1,585 |
102 | Brian Willie | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $1,584 |
103 | Logan M Rux | Frazee, MN 56544 | $1,505 |
104 | Ryan Roberts | Perham, MN 56573 | $1,495 |
105 | Kenneth Seim | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $1,436 |
106 | Dennis Hass | Frazee, MN 56544 | $1,415 |
107 | Michael Bonk | Truman, MN 56088 | $1,401 |
108 | Jeremy H Hensel | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $1,357 |
109 | Timothy S Lehrke | Ogema, MN 56569 | $1,318 |
110 | Eagle View Inc | Ogema, MN 56569 | $1,318 |
111 | Aaron S Willie | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $1,217 |
112 | Jason W Mikkelsen | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $1,202 |
113 | Paul Yliniemi | Osage, MN 56570 | $1,188 |
114 | Jerald C Dahring | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $1,181 |
115 | Theresa Dahring | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $1,181 |
116 | Clayton Abel II | Pelican Rapids, MN 56572 | $1,177 |
117 | Gordon Keranen | Frazee, MN 56544 | $1,120 |
118 | Calvin M Oberg | Ulen, MN 56585 | $1,119 |
119 | Jeramie Jacobson | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $1,084 |
120 | Mark Vetter | Rochert, MN 56578 | $1,066 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”