Total Conservation Programs in Benton County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 173
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Benton County, Minnesota totaled $184,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Darryl Bosshart | Foley, MN 56329 | $2,049 |
22 | Larry Balvitsch | Foley, MN 56329 | $2,009 |
23 | Lawrence A Thell | Foley, MN 56329 | $1,970 |
24 | Ralph Schmitz | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $1,947 |
25 | Richard E Kollmann | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $1,914 |
26 | Debra A Barbour | Foley, MN 56329 | $1,901 |
27 | Greener Family 2008 Rvoc Tr Agreement | Foley, MN 56329 | $1,726 |
28 | Joseph Jordan | Princeton, MN 55371 | $1,704 |
29 | Bonnie Marie Moeller | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $1,661 |
30 | Brian Popp | Rice, MN 56367 | $1,658 |
31 | Elizabeth J Mastey Revocable Trust | Foley, MN 56329 | $1,622 |
32 | Darlene A Jurek | Foley, MN 56329 | $1,588 |
33 | Wade D Bastian | Foley, MN 56329 | $1,577 |
34 | Richard Backes | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $1,568 |
35 | John Joseph Wirth | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $1,566 |
36 | Charles Plumadore | Foley, MN 56357 | $1,546 |
37 | Aimee Rife | Foley, MN 56329 | $1,531 |
38 | Joel Bemboom | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $1,509 |
39 | Robert H Abfalter | Foley, MN 56329 | $1,485 |
40 | Robert D Popp | Rice, MN 56367 | $1,389 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”