Farm Subsidy information
Benton County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Benton County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,940
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Benton County, Minnesota totaled $198,353,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jon S Hansmeier | Foley, MN 56329 | $490,913 |
62 | Ronald Bemboom | Gilman, MN 56333 | $488,568 |
63 | Eugene Rudolph | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $488,269 |
64 | Tp Gilyard Farms, Inc | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $486,917 |
65 | Dumonceaux Farms Inc | Foley, MN 56329 | $477,037 |
66 | Schustak Farms LLC | Foley, MN 56329 | $475,109 |
67 | John And Brian Rahm | Foley, MN 56329 | $464,777 |
68 | Frank Legatt | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $445,105 |
69 | Robert W Beauchamp Jr | Rice, MN 56367 | $425,569 |
70 | Kevin And Jacob Popp Partnership | Rice, MN 56367 | $425,198 |
71 | Gerard I And Dale M Baron | Foley, MN 56329 | $424,090 |
72 | David Scapanski | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $422,977 |
73 | Scapanski Rst Farm | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $421,792 |
74 | Mark Helgeson Farms Inc | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $419,230 |
75 | Riverview Enterprises | Foley, MN 56329 | $410,893 |
76 | Ronald Hess | Foley, MN 56329 | $408,475 |
77 | Fred Fleck | Rice, MN 56367 | $405,543 |
78 | M & L Kaschmitter Dairy | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $404,907 |
79 | Lynda K Gans | Rice, MN 56367 | $400,375 |
80 | Troy Popp | Rice, MN 56367 | $389,574 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”