Total Commodity Programs in Benton County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 380
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Benton County, Minnesota totaled $1,120,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Fred Fleck | Rice, MN 56367 | $3,399 |
82 | Terrence John Lewandowski | Foley, MN 56329 | $3,387 |
83 | Allan C Walcheski | Foley, MN 56329 | $3,243 |
84 | Travis D Brambrink | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $3,226 |
85 | Katherine Malikowski | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $3,196 |
86 | John Schiemann | Foley, MN 56329 | $3,192 |
87 | Troy Popp | Rice, MN 56367 | $3,126 |
88 | Dennis Studenski | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $3,120 |
89 | Glenn D Brambrink | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $3,105 |
90 | Lezer Farms | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $3,075 |
91 | Robert W Beauchamp Jr | Rice, MN 56367 | $3,066 |
92 | Paul Gapinski | Foley, MN 56329 | $3,055 |
93 | Sean Arnold | Foley, MN 56329 | $3,008 |
94 | Blank Cattle And Equipment LLC | Foley, MN 56329 | $2,980 |
95 | Mitchell Raymond Mehrwerth | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $2,970 |
96 | James Janson | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $2,924 |
97 | Bunker Hill Creek Farm, LLC | Rice, MN 56367 | $2,887 |
98 | Peter Jay Ratka | Foley, MN 56329 | $2,841 |
99 | Diana Mary Gorecki | Foley, MN 56329 | $2,804 |
100 | Walter Wendt | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $2,790 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”