Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Benton County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 544
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Benton County, Minnesota totaled $6,656,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Allen J Bauerly | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $173,164 |
2 | Michelle C Czech | Foley, MN 56329 | $152,944 |
3 | Mark Czech | Foley, MN 56329 | $152,944 |
4 | J & M Farms Of Rice LLC | Rice, MN 56367 | $124,177 |
5 | Liethas Riverside Acres Inc | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $108,540 |
6 | Pietrzak Farms LLC | Rice, MN 56367 | $103,853 |
7 | Anderson Partnership | Foley, MN 56329 | $95,598 |
8 | Prairie Farm Co Inc | Rice, MN 56367 | $94,562 |
9 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $93,764 |
10 | Tp Gilyard Farms, Inc | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $89,207 |
11 | Mark Helgeson Farms Inc | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $85,396 |
12 | Schustak Farms LLC | Foley, MN 56329 | $83,437 |
13 | Michael Landwehr | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $79,140 |
14 | J & J Molitor Dairy LLC | Foley, MN 56329 | $72,415 |
15 | Schlichting Farms Inc | Rice, MN 56367 | $66,704 |
16 | Robert Waldon John Anderson | Becker, MN 55308 | $66,387 |
17 | Scapanski Farms LLC | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $65,835 |
18 | Dumonceaux Farms Inc | Foley, MN 56329 | $64,597 |
19 | Kevin Mehrwerth | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $63,047 |
20 | Glenn Seppelt | Foley, MN 56329 | $57,991 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>