Water Bank Program in Big Stone County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 126
Recipients of Water Bank Program from farms in Big Stone County, Minnesota totaled $227,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Water Bank Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Frances Henningson | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $1,233 |
62 | Arthur Hamann Est | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $1,211 |
63 | Robert Rothi | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $1,164 |
64 | William A Koeckeritz Est | Fergus Falls, MN 56537 | $1,164 |
65 | Ronald K Ronning | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $1,151 |
66 | Arlen Lacombe | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $1,137 |
67 | Lorraine Chase Est | Clinton, MN 56225 | $1,100 |
68 | Eugene Nelson | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $1,089 |
69 | Doris Johnson | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $1,035 |
70 | Justin Scholberg | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $1,033 |
71 | Donald Stock Family Revocable Tru | Odessa, MN 56276 | $1,010 |
72 | Larry Nelson | Clinton, MN 56225 | $955 |
73 | Wayne Zych | Beardsley, MN 56211 | $890 |
74 | Wilbert Sherod | New London, MN 56273 | $873 |
75 | Bruce Strobel | Clinton, MN 56225 | $861 |
76 | Donald Frederick | Clinton, MN 56225 | $851 |
77 | Harlen G Nelson | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $823 |
78 | Ronald E Thompson | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $819 |
79 | Robert Nelson Dr | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $809 |
80 | Floyd L Swenson | Saint Paul, MN 55112 | $802 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”