Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Big Stone County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 325
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Big Stone County, Minnesota totaled $20,430,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Maas Farms Trucking Inc | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $86,071 |
82 | Iver Kellen | Clinton, MN 56225 | $86,012 |
83 | Ryan L Danielson | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $85,438 |
84 | Thomas J Maanum | Graceville, MN 56240 | $85,105 |
85 | Vernon Johnson | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $84,744 |
86 | Charles R Thompson | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $84,463 |
87 | Kevin Taffe Farms LLC | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $83,326 |
88 | Wayne Schoon | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $82,927 |
89 | Dark Enterprises | Clinton, MN 56225 | $81,323 |
90 | Erick Klepel | Odessa, MN 56276 | $81,190 |
91 | Double H Farms | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $80,960 |
92 | Marty Stotesbery | Graceville, MN 56240 | $78,894 |
93 | Dan Morrill | Clinton, MN 56225 | $78,857 |
94 | Michael Hinneberg | Odessa, MN 56276 | $77,970 |
95 | Matthew G Drewicke | Herman, MN 56248 | $76,922 |
96 | Raymond Pansch | Graceville, MN 56240 | $73,929 |
97 | Bruce Hoernemann | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $73,246 |
98 | Michael Maas | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $72,398 |
99 | Randall Schoon | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $71,938 |
100 | Troy Cronen | Clinton, MN 56225 | $70,650 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”