Deficiency Payment in Big Stone County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 503
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Big Stone County, Minnesota totaled $866,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Stanley Lindholm | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $3,187 |
102 | Michael A Munsterman | Appleton, MN 56208 | $3,129 |
103 | Mark Allen Chase | Clinton, MN 56225 | $3,119 |
104 | Dennis Lund | Correll, MN 56227 | $3,092 |
105 | Kyle Gillespie | Clinton, MN 56225 | $3,083 |
106 | Brent Zahrbock | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $3,052 |
107 | Mark Block | Correll, MN 56227 | $3,030 |
108 | Lawrence J Arens | Graceville, MN 56240 | $2,998 |
109 | Eldred Swenson | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $2,982 |
110 | Craig W Wilkening | Appleton, MN 56208 | $2,966 |
111 | Peter H Holme | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $2,946 |
112 | R Randall Farms Inc | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $2,924 |
113 | Whetstone Living Trust | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $2,904 |
114 | Roger Nosbusch | Barry, MN 56210 | $2,852 |
115 | Leslie Debuhr | Chokio, MN 56221 | $2,845 |
116 | James A Aasland | Appleton, MN 56208 | $2,843 |
117 | Jerome Holker | Beardsley, MN 56211 | $2,837 |
118 | Thomas J Maanum | Graceville, MN 56240 | $2,825 |
119 | Donald Karsky | Clinton, MN 56225 | $2,791 |
120 | Craig Strobel Farms Inc | Clinton, MN 56225 | $2,783 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”