Production Flexibility Program in Blue Earth County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,413
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Blue Earth County, Minnesota totaled $43,728,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lee Manthei | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $140,397 |
42 | Melvin C Moore Estate | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $140,171 |
43 | Seys Bros Paul Seys Pr | Janesville, MN 56048 | $138,919 |
44 | Steve Yahnke | Mesa, AZ 85208 | $138,917 |
45 | Gene Michael Gilman | Mankato, MN 56001 | $135,559 |
46 | Brian Jaeger | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $133,821 |
47 | Neal Corliss Grover | Amboy, MN 56010 | $133,160 |
48 | Noy Farms Inc | Vernon Center, MN 56090 | $133,131 |
49 | James E Heins | Vernon Center, MN 56090 | $132,625 |
50 | Kenneth R Sorensen | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $131,132 |
51 | Mary Duncanson | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $130,773 |
52 | John Loren Engles | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $130,603 |
53 | James Pahl | Vernon Center, MN 56090 | $130,087 |
54 | Hislop Farms Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $129,894 |
55 | Rick Norman Nienow | Amboy, MN 56010 | $129,657 |
56 | Roberts Farms Inc | Madelia, MN 56062 | $129,563 |
57 | Ramy International Ltd | Mankato, MN 56002 | $124,088 |
58 | Ulrich Acres Inc | Good Thunder, MN 56037 | $123,733 |
59 | Darrell G Anderegg | Eagle Lake, MN 56024 | $122,063 |
60 | Roger J Matzke | Good Thunder, MN 56037 | $121,279 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”