Farm Subsidy information
Blue Earth County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Blue Earth County, Minnesota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,326
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Blue Earth County, Minnesota totaled $32,803,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | S & H Farms Partnership | Mankato, MN 56001 | $448,392 |
2 | Highland Family Farms | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $404,856 |
3 | F&h Partnership Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $331,577 |
4 | Nienow Acres | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $314,430 |
5 | Manthei Brothers | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $288,639 |
6 | Flagship Pork Finishers Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $284,543 |
7 | Brandts Farm Partnership | Garden City, MN 56034 | $278,882 |
8 | Brian H Loeffler | Janesville, MN 56048 | $275,795 |
9 | Dean Peters & Sons | Good Thunder, MN 56037 | $260,538 |
10 | Lantz Enterprises Inc | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $250,000 |
11 | Flagship Pork Partner Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $237,203 |
12 | Kd2 Farms Partnership | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $233,911 |
13 | Caldwell Farms Llp | Amboy, MN 56010 | $206,519 |
14 | David J Krengel | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $196,699 |
15 | Roberts Farms Inc | Madelia, MN 56062 | $194,161 |
16 | Maple Valley Pork | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $188,527 |
17 | Michael R Ward | Janesville, MN 56048 | $186,038 |
18 | Scott David Lynch | Janesville, MN 56048 | $185,753 |
19 | Dewitz Farms Inc | Good Thunder, MN 56037 | $183,076 |
20 | Jack May | Mankato, MN 56001 | $181,993 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>