Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Brown County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 552
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Brown County, Minnesota totaled $779,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lendt Farms Inc | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $5,009 |
22 | Gary And Dean Sellner Partnership | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $5,006 |
23 | John E Hauser | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $5,005 |
24 | David Vogel | Springfield, MN 56087 | $5,003 |
25 | Dean Botten | Hanska, MN 56041 | $5,003 |
26 | Kurt R Kratz | Springfield, MN 56087 | $5,003 |
27 | Alan Terence Hagen | Hanska, MN 56041 | $5,002 |
28 | Daniel Steffl | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $5,002 |
29 | Mark Rasmussen | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $5,002 |
30 | Marti Hog Farm Inc | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $5,000 |
31 | Hauser Farms Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $5,000 |
32 | Schumacher Brothers | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $5,000 |
33 | Edward Berkner | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $5,000 |
34 | Dennis Wildt | Morgan, MN 56266 | $5,000 |
35 | Patrick J Sturm | Springfield, MN 56087 | $5,000 |
36 | Ervan Moldan | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $5,000 |
37 | Gerald E Engholm | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $5,000 |
38 | Gregory A Bartz | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $5,000 |
39 | Russell Stueber | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $5,000 |
40 | James D Hanson | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $5,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”