Total Commodity Programs in Brown County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,642
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Brown County, Minnesota totaled $309,545,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Skh Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $821,326 |
42 | Michael A Krueger | Springfield, MN 56087 | $808,539 |
43 | Jon Beckius | Hanska, MN 56041 | $795,766 |
44 | Greg Grausam | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $794,539 |
45 | James L Mickelson | Springfield, MN 56087 | $794,365 |
46 | Patrick J Klinkner | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $786,313 |
47 | Dirt Poor Farms Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $785,512 |
48 | Lorin Helget | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $775,540 |
49 | D & B Farms Inc | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $774,316 |
50 | Fischer Dairy Inc | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $774,314 |
51 | Brian L Nelson | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $770,149 |
52 | Mike L Sellner | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $768,569 |
53 | Alliance Bank ** | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $765,548 |
54 | Griebel's Black And Whites Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $762,363 |
55 | David D Tauer | Hanska, MN 56041 | $758,987 |
56 | D & A Farms Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $757,885 |
57 | Steven John Meyer | Springfield, MN 56087 | $755,642 |
58 | Thomas J Portner | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $753,606 |
59 | Gregory P Haubrich | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $753,484 |
60 | Francis J Fromm | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $752,161 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”