Conservation Reserve Program in Brown County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 639
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Brown County, Minnesota totaled $3,071,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Michelle Schultz | Morgan, MN 56266 | $10,498 |
82 | Carol Brennan | Edina, MN 55439 | $10,498 |
83 | Alan Kral | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $10,496 |
84 | James Meinert | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $10,407 |
85 | Lendt Farms Inc | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $10,364 |
86 | Douglas P Nosbush | Fairfax, MN 55332 | $10,286 |
87 | Michael J Moldan | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $10,261 |
88 | Wenzel Vogel | Springfield, MN 56087 | $9,943 |
89 | Jeffrey L Hoffman | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $9,540 |
90 | Patrick D Vogel | Springfield, MN 56087 | $9,513 |
91 | Wellmann Heritage Farms LLC | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $9,466 |
92 | Lenis Perry Roiger | Sanborn, MN 56083 | $9,445 |
93 | Donald A Mathiowetz | Springfield, MN 56087 | $9,391 |
94 | Timothy Alan Vogel | Springfield, MN 56087 | $9,319 |
95 | Dennis Zempel | Morgan, MN 56266 | $9,306 |
96 | Theodore J Anderson | Springfield, MN 56087 | $9,268 |
97 | Fischer Ridge LLC | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $9,125 |
98 | Howard F Prahl Disclaimer Trust | Redwood Falls, MN 56283 | $8,846 |
99 | Loren Brekke | Hanska, MN 56041 | $8,745 |
100 | Larry G Christensen | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $8,554 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”