Direct Payment Program in Brown County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,532
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Brown County, Minnesota totaled $59,769,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Gerald Lux | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $139,039 |
82 | Bradley Portner | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $138,216 |
83 | Weak Enterprises Inc | Hanska, MN 56041 | $137,879 |
84 | David Hertling | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $137,675 |
85 | Duane Suess | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $137,255 |
86 | Kenneth Lux | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $136,656 |
87 | Moll Turkey's Inc | The Villages, FL 32163 | $135,617 |
88 | Daniel Steffl | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $133,707 |
89 | John Garrioch | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $133,417 |
90 | John A Thormodson | Madelia, MN 56062 | $133,004 |
91 | John L Maas | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $132,485 |
92 | Kevin Thormodson | Hanska, MN 56041 | $132,219 |
93 | Gary Nelson | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $130,973 |
94 | Michael A Krueger | Springfield, MN 56087 | $130,138 |
95 | Lynn Krenz | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $129,976 |
96 | Donald Wellner | Springfield, MN 56087 | $129,915 |
97 | Kenneth Moe | Springfield, MN 56087 | $129,356 |
98 | Gary And Dean Sellner Partnership | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $129,354 |
99 | James J Vogel | Springfield, MN 56087 | $129,142 |
100 | John R Hoffmann | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $128,767 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”