Conservation Reserve Program in Brown County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 639
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Brown County, Minnesota totaled $3,071,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | John C Fischer | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $8,458 |
102 | Grace L Steffl | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $8,394 |
103 | Speckman Farms Inc | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $8,357 |
104 | Delores H Haas | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $8,356 |
105 | Verlin E Goering Family Trust | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $8,230 |
106 | Eloise Finstad | Hanska, MN 56041 | $8,178 |
107 | Douglas Hinderman | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $7,985 |
108 | Schewe Farms Inc | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $7,908 |
109 | Robert Schumacher | Edina, MN 55416 | $7,880 |
110 | , | $7,808 | |
111 | Skh Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $7,770 |
112 | Pete Hoffman Trucking Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $7,770 |
113 | Steve R Krebs | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $7,716 |
114 | Kyle Wellmann | Hanska, MN 56041 | $7,571 |
115 | Kenneth M Lang Living Trust | Springfield, MN 56087 | $7,460 |
116 | Cunningham Seed Farms Inc | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $7,398 |
117 | Wayne Braun | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $7,394 |
118 | Terence And Pamela Mcwilliams Trust | Tucson, AZ 85750 | $7,312 |
119 | Matthew Schmidt | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $7,220 |
120 | Tammy Schmidt Hatlested | Spicer, MN 56288 | $7,220 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”