Conservation Reserve Program in Brown County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 639
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Brown County, Minnesota totaled $3,071,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Chad M Hoffmann | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $7,209 |
122 | Kathleen M Vogel | Sanborn, MN 56083 | $7,180 |
123 | Peter Windschitl | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $7,134 |
124 | Jerome Graff | Sanborn, MN 56083 | $7,109 |
125 | Mathiowetz Family Farm 2 Llp | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $7,077 |
126 | Ricky Augustin | Springfield, MN 56087 | $7,016 |
127 | Marion C Augustin | Springfield, MN 56087 | $7,016 |
128 | Donald Domeier | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $7,014 |
129 | Ronda Mathiowetz | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $6,854 |
130 | Mathiowetz-kuester Llp | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $6,644 |
131 | Janice A Brekke | Hanska, MN 56041 | $6,623 |
132 | Tamara M Furth | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $6,570 |
133 | Cleo Marie Matzke | Good Thunder, MN 56037 | $6,456 |
134 | Edwin J Windschitl | Springfield, MN 56087 | $6,232 |
135 | Paul J Hoffman | Hanska, MN 56041 | $6,221 |
136 | Randy Wiltscheck | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $6,191 |
137 | Kornerstone LLC | Rochester, MN 55906 | $6,170 |
138 | Brent D Bast | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $6,169 |
139 | Gregory R Bast | Kansas City, KS 66109 | $6,169 |
140 | Richard Baumann | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $6,085 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”