Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Brown County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 423
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Brown County, Minnesota totaled $8,373,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Craig J Holm | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $179,549 |
2 | Randy Thordson | Hanska, MN 56041 | $144,694 |
3 | Margaret J Thordson | Hanska, MN 56041 | $144,668 |
4 | Brad & Dean Hoffmann Ptshp | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $131,488 |
5 | Fischer Brothers Farms Inc | Hanska, MN 56041 | $125,000 |
6 | Theodore J Anderson | Springfield, MN 56087 | $119,424 |
7 | Lori L Schneider | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $107,138 |
8 | Michael H Lilleodden | Hanska, MN 56041 | $102,277 |
9 | Joseph Braulick | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $93,454 |
10 | Susan Anderson | Springfield, MN 56087 | $91,676 |
11 | Patrick Mohr | Hanska, MN 56041 | $83,759 |
12 | Reiner Brothers | Springfield, MN 56087 | $82,149 |
13 | Gary Raymond Roiger | Sanborn, MN 56083 | $76,379 |
14 | James A Anderson | Springfield, MN 56087 | $76,064 |
15 | Clyde A Larson | Hanska, MN 56041 | $72,168 |
16 | Bruce Menk | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $71,625 |
17 | Suess Farms Inc | Hanska, MN 56041 | $70,494 |
18 | John T Drexler | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $68,282 |
19 | Scott Russell Rose | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $68,236 |
20 | Bradley Portner | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $64,973 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>