Dairy Programs in Brown County, Minnesota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 61
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Brown County, Minnesota totaled $694,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Colleen Berscheit | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $15,381 |
22 | Steven L Seifert | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $14,715 |
23 | Jay Joe Moldan | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $14,550 |
24 | Autumn Breeze Dairy | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $12,807 |
25 | Schwab Farms Inc | Gibbon, MN 55335 | $12,646 |
26 | Reiner Brothers | Springfield, MN 56087 | $11,533 |
27 | Gary L Hillesheim | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $11,389 |
28 | Binder Farms Inc | Gibbon, MN 55335 | $11,258 |
29 | Griebel's Black And Whites Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $10,408 |
30 | Cory D Wilson | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $10,160 |
31 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $9,741 |
32 | Michael Andrew Lax | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $9,469 |
33 | David M Brandel Living Trust | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $7,736 |
34 | Reiner Farms LLC | Springfield, MN 56087 | $7,689 |
35 | Dean Sellner LLC | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $7,656 |
36 | Roland M Tauer | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $7,605 |
37 | Trevor S Kral | Hanska, MN 56041 | $7,590 |
38 | Ronald Mohr | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $5,612 |
39 | Michael A Hillesheim | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $5,109 |
40 | Patrick R Guggisberg | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $5,094 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”