Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Brown County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,243
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Brown County, Minnesota totaled $30,223,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Fischer Dairy Inc | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $114,368 |
22 | Rathman's Inc | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $113,937 |
23 | Thomas G Anderson | Springfield, MN 56087 | $112,238 |
24 | D & B Farms Inc | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $111,848 |
25 | Franta Farms Llp | Lafayette, MN 56054 | $111,838 |
26 | Reiner Brothers | Springfield, MN 56087 | $109,558 |
27 | James A Anderson | Springfield, MN 56087 | $108,750 |
28 | Susan Anderson | Springfield, MN 56087 | $102,062 |
29 | D & A Farms Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $100,491 |
30 | John Dallenbach | Morgan, MN 56266 | $98,692 |
31 | Kenneth Moe | Springfield, MN 56087 | $98,446 |
32 | Tauer Brothers | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $97,672 |
33 | Roiger Farms Inc | Springfield, MN 56087 | $96,852 |
34 | Patrick Mohr | Hanska, MN 56041 | $96,499 |
35 | Gregory P Haubrich | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $95,507 |
36 | Ryan Farms Partnership | Springfield, MN 56087 | $94,207 |
37 | Jeffrey S Schultz | Springfield, MN 56087 | $91,379 |
38 | Dirt Poor Farms Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $90,116 |
39 | Jonathan B Petermann | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $88,779 |
40 | Duane Suess | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $87,299 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”