Conservation Reserve Program in Brown County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 616
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Brown County, Minnesota totaled $2,819,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kay Pingeon | Springfield, MN 56087 | $23,850 |
22 | Vogel Saw Mill | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $22,854 |
23 | Marie Weinberger | Springfield, MN 56087 | $22,613 |
24 | Randy S Baier | Springfield, MN 56087 | $22,273 |
25 | Howard And Connie Johnson Trust | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $21,324 |
26 | James Wendinger | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $21,084 |
27 | Home Farm Partnership | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $20,333 |
28 | Kevin J Rupp | Eden Prairie, MN 55346 | $19,360 |
29 | Mary F Davis | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $18,994 |
30 | Gene Rolloff | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $17,700 |
31 | Michael Leonard Carson | Eagle Lake, MN 56024 | $17,019 |
32 | Jeffrey R Koehler | Belgrade, MN 56312 | $16,945 |
33 | Gerald S Mathiowetz | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $16,504 |
34 | Merle J Krueger | Springfield, MN 56087 | $16,143 |
35 | Steven Ralph Carson | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $16,116 |
36 | Marlene M Sauer | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $14,968 |
37 | Helen Rogotzke | Sanborn, MN 56083 | $14,857 |
38 | Marcella Freida Holm | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $14,649 |
39 | Karl F Vachuska | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $14,266 |
40 | Jeffrey Bussler | Winthrop, MN 55396 | $13,876 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”