Total Commodity Programs in Brown County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,642
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Brown County, Minnesota totaled $309,545,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Daniel Steffl | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $738,871 |
62 | Stanley Seifert | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $724,556 |
63 | Larry G Christensen | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $711,968 |
64 | John T Drexler | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $711,512 |
65 | Mark Sletta | Hanska, MN 56041 | $703,531 |
66 | Lax Brothers Partnership | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $702,590 |
67 | Richard Trebesch | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $701,725 |
68 | Schwartz Brothers Partnership | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $697,264 |
69 | Ray R Christensen | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $693,716 |
70 | Russell Anderson | Springfield, MN 56087 | $688,547 |
71 | Roger Kettner | Morton, MN 56270 | $683,193 |
72 | Steven L Seifert | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $682,713 |
73 | Curtis A Thram | Sanborn, MN 56083 | $681,688 |
74 | Patrick Mohr | Hanska, MN 56041 | $680,028 |
75 | Jeffrey L Halvorson | Madelia, MN 56062 | $676,634 |
76 | Weak Enterprises Inc | Hanska, MN 56041 | $674,032 |
77 | Joseph Braulick | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $673,557 |
78 | Scott Peterson | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $671,339 |
79 | Richard G Groebner | Springfield, MN 56087 | $664,596 |
80 | Duane Weerts | Springfield, MN 56087 | $661,168 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”