Farm Subsidy information
Carlton County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Carlton County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 403
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Carlton County, Minnesota totaled $7,327,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jeremy Adam Grimm | Moose Lake, MN 55767 | $27,792 |
62 | Scott Heittola | Wrenshall, MN 55797 | $26,946 |
63 | Timothy R Larson | Kettle River, MN 55757 | $26,892 |
64 | Jeremy P Pangerl | Kettle River, MN 55757 | $26,179 |
65 | Hillview Dairy Farm | Moose Lake, MN 55767 | $26,022 |
66 | James F Mallon | Wrenshall, MN 55797 | $25,650 |
67 | Swenson Dairy | Cloquet, MN 55720 | $25,253 |
68 | Randall J Wise | Sawyer, MN 55780 | $25,015 |
69 | Michael Salzer | Barnum, MN 55707 | $24,207 |
70 | Robert Moffett Jr | Moose Lake, MN 55767 | $24,190 |
71 | Dave Entner | Moose Lake, MN 55767 | $23,791 |
72 | Julie Ketchum | Barnum, MN 55707 | $23,439 |
73 | Matthew Peterson | Carlton, MN 55718 | $22,562 |
74 | Matthew W Weik | Carlton, MN 55718 | $22,330 |
75 | Paul Kachinske | Kettle River, MN 55757 | $21,962 |
76 | Bruce Heikes | Northfield, MN 55057 | $21,808 |
77 | Daniel H Jurek | Mahtowa, MN 55707 | $21,721 |
78 | James Heikkila | Carlton, MN 55718 | $21,448 |
79 | Karen V Mattson | Cromwell, MN 55726 | $21,003 |
80 | Roger A Gustafson Gustafson Guernsey Farm | Mahtowa, MN 55707 | $20,458 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”