Counter Cyclical Program in Carver County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 542
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Carver County, Minnesota totaled $4,418,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Paul Neaton | Watertown, MN 55388 | $23,888 |
42 | Kerber Bros Steve & Doug | Cologne, MN 55322 | $23,862 |
43 | Harri Rinta | Carver, MN 55315 | $23,557 |
44 | Jane Wellens | Carver, MN 55315 | $23,474 |
45 | Donald Hoese | Mayer, MN 55360 | $23,250 |
46 | Daniel E Menth | New Germany, MN 55367 | $22,879 |
47 | Marlyn Loehrs | Cologne, MN 55322 | $22,263 |
48 | Eugene Schlegelmilch | Chaska, MN 55318 | $22,234 |
49 | Anthony Chevalier | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $22,074 |
50 | Oelfke Farms | Hamburg, MN 55339 | $21,856 |
51 | James Robert Hesse | Chaska, MN 55318 | $21,754 |
52 | Elizabeth A Barfnecht Revocable T | Mayer, MN 55360 | $20,862 |
53 | Dale G Barfnecht Revocable Trust | Mayer, MN 55360 | $20,861 |
54 | Southview Dairy LLC | Cologne, MN 55322 | $20,664 |
55 | Augie Kreye | Young America, MN 55397 | $20,518 |
56 | Michael Harms | Norwood Young Americ, MN 55368 | $20,039 |
57 | Henschen Acres | Norwood, MN 55368 | $19,550 |
58 | Juliene Klaustermeier | Waconia, MN 55387 | $19,310 |
59 | Glenn Traver | Cologne, MN 55322 | $19,155 |
60 | Michael P Wellens | Carver, MN 55315 | $19,079 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”