Production Flexibility Program in Carver County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 742
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Carver County, Minnesota totaled $14,038,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Linda Marie Worm | Norwood Young Americ, MN 55397 | $37,196 |
102 | Wickenhauser Holstein Farm | Cologne, MN 55322 | $37,170 |
103 | Larry Mackenthun | Hamburg, MN 55339 | $36,726 |
104 | Dale Molnau | Cologne, MN 55322 | $36,031 |
105 | Gerard A Beckrich | Cologne, MN 55322 | $35,878 |
106 | Estate Of Stanley Wabbe | Mayer, MN 55360 | $35,613 |
107 | John Haas | Young America, MN 55397 | $35,593 |
108 | E J Holasek & Son | Chanhassen, MN 55317 | $35,540 |
109 | Scott F Hoese | Mayer, MN 55360 | $35,429 |
110 | James Abraham | Cologne, MN 55322 | $35,234 |
111 | Einard Karnitz | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $34,896 |
112 | Don Le Brook Farms | Young America, MN 55397 | $34,870 |
113 | Donald Klaustermeier | Young America, MN 55397 | $34,635 |
114 | Lonnie Luce | Waconia, MN 55387 | $34,524 |
115 | Willard Stender | Young America, MN 55397 | $34,482 |
116 | Leonard Hoen Jr | Norwood, MN 55368 | $34,364 |
117 | Roger Harlan Klaustermeier | Mission, TX 78572 | $34,091 |
118 | Eldon Westlund | Mayer, MN 55360 | $33,966 |
119 | Alvin Gohlke | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $33,834 |
120 | Laumann Jerome Or Ralph | Cologne, MN 55322 | $33,374 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”