Production Flexibility Program in Chippewa County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,044
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Chippewa County, Minnesota totaled $28,817,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Stanley B Claussen | Benson, MN 56215 | $84,200 |
82 | Edward O Sachariason | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $83,643 |
83 | Scott A Roelofs | Raymond, MN 56282 | $83,480 |
84 | Stanley Harms | Clara City, MN 56222 | $83,284 |
85 | James R Hinrichs | Clara City, MN 56222 | $82,495 |
86 | Dale Spray Estate Lorrie Spray Pr | Milan, MN 56262 | $82,110 |
87 | J & M Kleven Inc | Milan, MN 56262 | $81,893 |
88 | Robert D Kurtzbein | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $81,304 |
89 | Elaine Marie Sonstegard | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $80,857 |
90 | Gary Gades | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $80,405 |
91 | Rode Farms | Benson, MN 56215 | $79,177 |
92 | William H Schuler | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $78,488 |
93 | Larry Dirksen | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $77,964 |
94 | Jason Lee Schwitters | Clara City, MN 56222 | $76,414 |
95 | Robert Enevoldsen | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $75,870 |
96 | Dennis L Gibson | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $75,533 |
97 | Kleven Agra Inc | Milan, MN 56262 | $75,260 |
98 | James Eichhorst | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $75,197 |
99 | Douglas B Teichert | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $75,078 |
100 | Darrol Olsen | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $73,972 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”