Conservation Reserve Program in Chippewa County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 574
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Chippewa County, Minnesota totaled $2,001,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Thomas Duhoux | Big Stone City, SD 57216 | $5,229 |
122 | Rose Ann Hanson | Milan, MN 56262 | $5,209 |
123 | Jeffrey Marholz | Becker, MN 55308 | $5,179 |
124 | Rodeberg Part /steven Agent | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $5,157 |
125 | Gary Schaller | Maynard, MN 56260 | $5,097 |
126 | Duane Grube Jr | Appleton, MN 56208 | $5,077 |
127 | Melvin Mortenson | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $5,076 |
128 | Daryl Hoogeveen | Willmar, MN 56201 | $5,053 |
129 | Caryle Clifford | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $4,995 |
130 | Avis Peters | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $4,989 |
131 | Jason Norby | Milan, MN 56262 | $4,914 |
132 | Jan T Devries | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $4,912 |
133 | Nathan Weber | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $4,730 |
134 | John T Nordgaard | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $4,673 |
135 | R Elaine Erickson | Milan, MN 56262 | $4,669 |
136 | Lee Bosch | Clara City, MN 56222 | $4,653 |
137 | Skylane Family Limited Ptsp | Plymouth, MN 55446 | $4,567 |
138 | Elmer A Boike Trust | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $4,560 |
139 | , | $4,560 | |
140 | Michelle Whitehead | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $4,379 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”