Farm Subsidy information
Chisago County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Chisago County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 264
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chisago County, Minnesota totaled $4,407,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kent Reed | Center City, MN 55012 | $16,932 |
42 | Marvin Schroeder | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $16,667 |
43 | Michael William Riopel | Hugo, MN 55038 | $16,171 |
44 | Lonnie D Eklund | Stanchfield, MN 55080 | $14,614 |
45 | Irvin Stolp | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $14,030 |
46 | Eric Eklund | Ham Lake, MN 55304 | $13,472 |
47 | Richard Prahl | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $13,326 |
48 | Arlen Burnside | North Branch, MN 55056 | $12,819 |
49 | Cindy Blatz | Rush City, MN 55069 | $12,458 |
50 | Steven Houle | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $11,968 |
51 | Stacy Burnside | North Branch, MN 55056 | $11,957 |
52 | Bradley Gene Hunter | North Branch, MN 55056 | $10,961 |
53 | David G Stamm | North Branch, MN 55056 | $10,545 |
54 | Donald J Steinke | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $10,411 |
55 | Waletzko Brothers LLC | North Branch, MN 55056 | $10,304 |
56 | Dale Thiry | Stanchfield, MN 55080 | $10,191 |
57 | Robert J Nelson | Center City, MN 55012 | $9,732 |
58 | G. Phillip Rambosek | Shafer, MN 55074 | $9,303 |
59 | Kurt O Nelson | Shafer, MN 55074 | $9,050 |
60 | Richard Fairbanks | North Branch, MN 55056 | $8,974 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”