Loan Deficiency in Chisago County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 381
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Chisago County, Minnesota totaled $4,674,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Verner Greene Sr | Shafer, MN 55074 | $27,569 |
42 | Richard J Greene | North Branch, MN 55056 | $27,410 |
43 | Larry Lindahl | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $27,184 |
44 | Neal Dueholm | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $26,226 |
45 | Bruce M Peterson | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $26,131 |
46 | Holmquist Farm Inc | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $25,498 |
47 | Ronald E Johnson | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $25,110 |
48 | Dale Thiry | Stanchfield, MN 55080 | $24,480 |
49 | Jay T Flodquist | North Branch, MN 55056 | $23,905 |
50 | Cedar Hedge N Dairy | Rush City, MN 55069 | $23,533 |
51 | Roger Thomasen | Scandia, MN 55073 | $22,965 |
52 | Arlen Burnside | North Branch, MN 55056 | $22,869 |
53 | Paul O Olson | Shafer, MN 55074 | $22,649 |
54 | Allen Peltier | Center City, MN 55012 | $22,583 |
55 | Verner Greene Jr | Shafer, MN 55074 | $22,556 |
56 | Bruce A Carlson | Rush City, MN 55069 | $22,539 |
57 | Eldon J Olson | Rush City, MN 55069 | $22,430 |
58 | Charles Wilcox | Harris, MN 55032 | $22,294 |
59 | Daniel M Schultz | Center City, MN 55012 | $22,280 |
60 | Randy Mold | Rush City, MN 55069 | $21,764 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”