Production Flexibility Program in Chisago County, Minnesota, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 527

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Chisago County, Minnesota totaled $6,237,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2023
41Leland R A JohnsonNorth Branch, MN 55056$35,299
42Ernie J Fransen JrRush City, MN 55069$35,191
43Raymond Scott GayBraham, MN 55006$34,963
44Verner Greene JrShafer, MN 55074$33,809
45Jerome EklundShoreview, MN 55126$33,191
46John PearsonStanchfield, MN 55080$32,789
47Nick BuehringRush City, MN 55069$32,776
48Alan G HultmanCenter City, MN 55012$31,628
49David C JohnsonLindstrom, MN 55045$31,590
50Richard R PetersonShafer, MN 55074$31,132
51Marlin L NessCenter City, MN 55012$30,946
52Harold L EklundStanchfield, MN 55080$30,803
53Daniel M SchultzCenter City, MN 55012$29,988
54Peter A JohnsonRush City, MN 55069$29,433
55Myron TwingstromRush City, MN 55069$29,132
56Dale HawkinsonShafer, MN 55074$28,881
57Randy MoldRush City, MN 55069$28,594
58Joseph EichtenCenter City, MN 55012$28,388
59L Clifford HolcombNorth Branch, MN 55056$28,376
60Robb MedinCenter City, MN 55012$27,873

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag