Loan Deficiency in Chisago County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 381
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Chisago County, Minnesota totaled $4,674,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Bradley Gene Hunter | North Branch, MN 55056 | $14,025 |
102 | Clifford Schaber Est | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $13,698 |
103 | Jason G Holmstrom | Harris, MN 55032 | $13,660 |
104 | Craig Moline | North Branch, MN 55056 | $13,455 |
105 | Wayne H Hall | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $12,680 |
106 | Douglas R Melby | North Branch, MN 55056 | $12,649 |
107 | Gary E Moris | Polebridge, MT 59928 | $12,585 |
108 | Kevin Peterson | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $12,579 |
109 | Myron Twingstrom | Rush City, MN 55069 | $12,548 |
110 | L Clifford Holcomb | North Branch, MN 55056 | $12,292 |
111 | Everett Eichten | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $12,125 |
112 | David W Rue | North Branch, MN 55056 | $12,070 |
113 | Daniel H Carlson | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $11,981 |
114 | Kurt O Nelson | Shafer, MN 55074 | $11,898 |
115 | Gerald Koran | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $11,646 |
116 | Curtis V Sellman | North Branch, MN 55056 | $11,626 |
117 | Dale Schmitz | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $11,470 |
118 | Loren R Peterson | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $11,181 |
119 | L Patrick Greene | Shafer, MN 55074 | $10,648 |
120 | Alan Abrahamson | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $10,596 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”