Production Flexibility Program in Chisago County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 527
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Chisago County, Minnesota totaled $6,237,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Duane E Moulton | Rush City, MN 55069 | $15,241 |
122 | Harvey Corey | Center City, MN 55012 | $15,138 |
123 | Dan Blatz | Rush City, MN 55069 | $14,881 |
124 | James Ottum Estate | Johnson, VT 05656 | $14,847 |
125 | Ronald A Nelson | Amery, WI 54001 | $14,643 |
126 | Louis Ahlstrand | Shafer, MN 55074 | $14,630 |
127 | Roger Blazek | Rush City, MN 55069 | $14,588 |
128 | Nordell G Anderson | Center City, MN 55012 | $14,535 |
129 | Jack Sprinkle | Harris, MN 55032 | $14,515 |
130 | Raymond Holmquist | Shafer, MN 55074 | $14,432 |
131 | Douglas Hagfors | Braham, MN 55006 | $14,368 |
132 | Bruce A Dresel | Circle, MT 59215 | $14,215 |
133 | L Patrick Greene | Shafer, MN 55074 | $14,103 |
134 | Duane M Johnson | North Branch, MN 55056 | $14,072 |
135 | Brian D Johnson | Shafer, MN 55074 | $14,041 |
136 | William D Strelow | Braham, MN 55006 | $14,012 |
137 | Thomas Krawczewski | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $13,896 |
138 | Gary Guse | Harris, MN 55032 | $13,652 |
139 | Harley Investment Company | North Branch, MN 55056 | $13,622 |
140 | Gary E Moris | Polebridge, MT 59928 | $13,090 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”