Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Chisago County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 154
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Chisago County, Minnesota totaled $1,292,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jonathan C Moulton | Rush City, MN 55069 | $192,277 |
2 | Lindahl Farms LLC | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $45,205 |
3 | Thomas A Carlisle | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $42,995 |
4 | Jay T Flodquist | North Branch, MN 55056 | $41,259 |
5 | Taylor Farms LLC | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $39,906 |
6 | Sandberg Farms | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $37,969 |
7 | Kevin Mann | North Branch, MN 55056 | $33,330 |
8 | Bruce M Peterson | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $33,270 |
9 | Diane J Peterson | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $33,270 |
10 | Lindo Farms LLC | Center City, MN 55012 | $32,310 |
11 | Dna Farms Inc | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $32,243 |
12 | Gordon Rehbein Farms - C/o Matt Rehbein | Hugo, MN 55038 | $29,836 |
13 | Daninger Inc | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $28,708 |
14 | Kgl Farms | North Branch, MN 55056 | $27,321 |
15 | Charles Wilcox | Harris, MN 55032 | $25,771 |
16 | Meadowland Cattle Co | Shafer, MN 55074 | $19,160 |
17 | Lonnie D Eklund | Stanchfield, MN 55080 | $18,536 |
18 | Kevin Rochel | Shafer, MN 55074 | $18,426 |
19 | Chris J Taylor | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $16,622 |
20 | Martin W Johnson | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $16,336 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>