Farm Subsidy information
Chisago County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Chisago County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 264
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chisago County, Minnesota totaled $4,409,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Central Turf Farms | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $183,389 |
| 2 | Klm Farms Inc | North Branch, MN 55056 | $151,284 |
| 3 | Kevin Mann | North Branch, MN 55056 | $82,734 |
| 4 | Lindahl Farms LLC | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $67,485 |
| 5 | Jay T Flodquist | North Branch, MN 55056 | $63,700 |
| 6 | Sandberg Farms | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $61,211 |
| 7 | Dna Farms Inc | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $60,356 |
| 8 | John P Peterson Jr | North Branch, MN 55056 | $55,058 |
| 9 | Bruce M Peterson | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $51,558 |
| 10 | Diane J Peterson | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $51,558 |
| 11 | Thomas A Carlisle | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $50,547 |
| 12 | Martin W Johnson | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $46,351 |
| 13 | Cramaur Farm LLC | Rush City, MN 55069 | $46,135 |
| 14 | Barrett K Weness | Saint Croix Falls, WI 54024 | $39,703 |
| 15 | Lindo Farms LLC | Center City, MN 55012 | $38,036 |
| 16 | Gordon Rehbein Farms - C/o Matt Rehbein | Hugo, MN 55038 | $37,917 |
| 17 | Dale R Anderson | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $35,195 |
| 18 | Kgl Farms | North Branch, MN 55056 | $33,326 |
| 19 | Daninger Inc | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $32,584 |
| 20 | Robb Medin | Center City, MN 55012 | $32,195 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf