Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Chisago County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 357
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Chisago County, Minnesota totaled $4,320,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Irvin Stolp | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $48,707 |
22 | Jonathan C Moulton | Rush City, MN 55069 | $47,565 |
23 | George Phillip Rambosek | Shafer, MN 55074 | $44,371 |
24 | Robb Medin | Center City, MN 55012 | $44,230 |
25 | Swenson Farms LLC | North Branch, MN 55056 | $43,824 |
26 | Kent Reed | Center City, MN 55012 | $42,453 |
27 | John K Swanson | North Branch, MN 55056 | $41,104 |
28 | Jay T Flodquist | North Branch, MN 55056 | $37,552 |
29 | John T Carlson | Hugo, MN 55038 | $37,455 |
30 | Floyd May | Rush City, MN 55069 | $35,527 |
31 | Glenn A Carlson | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $35,012 |
32 | Steven L Holmquist | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $33,629 |
33 | Waletzko Brothers LLC | North Branch, MN 55056 | $32,894 |
34 | Ellen Jean St Sauver | Scandia, MN 55073 | $31,378 |
35 | Richard Prahl | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $30,409 |
36 | David G Stamm | North Branch, MN 55056 | $30,218 |
37 | Cindy Blatz | Rush City, MN 55069 | $29,585 |
38 | Thomas A Carlisle | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $29,501 |
39 | Eric Eklund | Ham Lake, MN 55304 | $27,600 |
40 | Petersen Farms Of Rush City Inc | Rush City, MN 55069 | $27,239 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”