Conservation Reserve Program in Cottonwood County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 517
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Cottonwood County, Minnesota totaled $2,395,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Lincoln Simonson | Jeffers, MN 56145 | $5,985 |
102 | Bruce A Mews | Windom, MN 56101 | $5,956 |
103 | , | $5,887 | |
104 | Diana L Kvilhaug | Worthington, MN 56187 | $5,862 |
105 | Arlene K Geary | Greeley, CO 80631 | $5,862 |
106 | Ardeen Brown Clark Family Limited Partnership | Sanborn, MN 56083 | $5,813 |
107 | Robert T Valleau 1972 Trust | Windom, MN 56101 | $5,760 |
108 | Gail Erickson | Mountain Lake, MN 56159 | $5,700 |
109 | Ludeman Family Investments LLC | Nisswa, MN 56468 | $5,498 |
110 | Dianne Bunting | Dundee, MN 56131 | $5,473 |
111 | Ronald & Monica Maurer Revocable Living Trust | Windom, MN 56101 | $5,398 |
112 | Reva R Berntson | Storden, MN 56174 | $5,124 |
113 | Barbara Larson | Windom, MN 56101 | $5,055 |
114 | Lucas L Satter And Charlene K Satter Family Rev Li | Bingham Lake, MN 56118 | $5,021 |
115 | Brian C Bosshart | Paynesville, MN 56362 | $5,010 |
116 | William H Nickel | Sanborn, MN 56083 | $4,982 |
117 | Steven B Nickel | Sanborn, MN 56083 | $4,982 |
118 | Verna Farms LLC | Bingham Lake, MN 56118 | $4,970 |
119 | Darren J Haugen | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $4,943 |
120 | Todd Michael Callanan | Council Bluffs, IA 51503 | $4,780 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”