Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Dakota County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 91
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Dakota County, Minnesota totaled $543,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pahl Farms Inc - C/o Gary Pahl | Apple Valley, MN 55124 | $126,291 |
2 | Yer Cha Vang | Merrill, WI 54452 | $76,040 |
3 | Pahl Farm Inc | Lakeville, MN 55044 | $49,243 |
4 | Gary W Berg | Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 | $48,813 |
5 | David E Lorence | Northfield, MN 55057 | $31,893 |
6 | Norbert P Wagner | Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 | $25,175 |
7 | Tong Moua | Decatur, AR 72722 | $22,617 |
8 | Jirik Sod Farms Inc | Farmington, MN 55024 | $15,744 |
9 | Patrick K Maher | Hastings, MN 55033 | $15,682 |
10 | Duff Apiaries Inc | Hampton, MN 55031 | $15,499 |
11 | James P Madson | Bertha, MN 56437 | $10,878 |
12 | Pao Vang | Maplewood, MN 55109 | $10,278 |
13 | Michael J A Leifeld | Hastings, MN 55033 | $6,912 |
14 | John & Ken Kingston | Hastings, MN 55033 | $5,061 |
15 | Mao Lee | Minneapolis, MN 55411 | $4,170 |
16 | Vernon J Hupf | Randolph, MN 55065 | $3,257 |
17 | Appleside Orchard Llp | Farmington, MN 55024 | $3,136 |
18 | Kevin M Huebscher | Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 | $3,080 |
19 | Daniel Reisinger | Farmington, MN 55024 | $2,820 |
20 | Jerrold R Stanton | Northfield, MN 55057 | $2,678 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>