Total Commodity Programs in Fillmore County, Minnesota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,079
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Fillmore County, Minnesota totaled $40,538,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Coyle Farms | Harmony, MN 55939 | $281,996 |
22 | Eric Scheevel | Preston, MN 55965 | $276,896 |
23 | Don Swenson | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $270,784 |
24 | Marvin Kuhn | Mabel, MN 55954 | $268,672 |
25 | North Prairie Farms LLC | Rushford, MN 55971 | $267,272 |
26 | Rahn Sass | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $261,273 |
27 | Benjamin S Rein | Lanesboro, MN 55949 | $254,831 |
28 | Soiney Farms LLC | Canton, MN 55922 | $239,644 |
29 | Goldsmith Brothers | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $226,653 |
30 | Duschee Hills Dairy LLC | Lanesboro, MN 55949 | $225,579 |
31 | Schwarz Farms Fountain | Fountain, MN 55935 | $218,587 |
32 | Simon Farms Llp | Preston, MN 55965 | $216,034 |
33 | Rick Jahn | Spring Valley, MN 55975 | $211,050 |
34 | Matthew Gust Gulbranson | Preston, MN 55965 | $201,220 |
35 | Robert Biel | Harmony, MN 55939 | $199,792 |
36 | Holst Cattle Farms LLC | Lanesboro, MN 55949 | $197,904 |
37 | Thompson Land & Livestock LLC | Harmony, MN 55939 | $194,500 |
38 | Mark Ruen | Lanesboro, MN 55949 | $188,093 |
39 | Carter R Lee | Rushford, MN 55971 | $184,302 |
40 | Featherstone Fruits And Vegetables LLC | Rushford, MN 55971 | $179,244 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”